Journalist: June 19, 2009
Date: Alan Mozes
Summary: This article summarizes the results of a research study which found that veterans who experience post-traumatic stress disorder may not experience poor health and shortened lives if they repress their combat experiences.
Relevance: Social workers provide a variety of services to veterans and their families.
Questions:
1) Why do the study findings go “against the grain”? Be sure to discuss suppression as a risk factor.
2) What techniques were used to test the validity of the findings? Who comprised the sample?
3) What data collected between 1985 and 2000 were used? What are your thoughts about using this data and the validity techniques to test the findings and assumptions of the study?
4) Why is caution suggested when interpreting the results of the study?
Click here to read the article